Why Internships Are Becoming More Important Than Majors
Employer preferences have shifted measurably over the past decade. New labor market data suggests that what students did during college now matters more than what they studied.
For most of the twentieth century, employers screened entry-level applicants primarily by major. The major signaled the body of knowledge a graduate possessed and the kind of work they were trained to do. By 2026, that screening logic has shifted significantly. A 2025 report from the National Association of Colleges and Employers, based on surveys of 1,800 hiring managers, finds that internship experience now ranks above choice of major as the most important factor in entry-level hiring decisions.
The shift has been quiet but cumulative. NACE data from 2008 ranked major as the top factor by a clear margin. By 2018, major and internship experience were roughly equivalent. In 2025, internship experience is ranked first by 64 percent of employers, with major in third position behind GPA.
Why the Shift Happened
Several forces converged to produce the change. Employers reported increasing difficulty in evaluating whether a major actually predicted job-relevant skills, particularly for fields where curriculum has diverged from current practice. They also reported that internship performance produced more reliable information about work habits, professional communication, and the kind of adaptation that classroom performance does not measure.
“Major tells you what someone studied. Internship tells you what they did with what they studied,” said Dr. Adaeze Okonkwo, who led the NACE analysis. “Employers have learned that the second is a better signal.”
What Counts as a “Real” Internship
The NACE data is specific about what employers value in internships. Paid internships are weighted significantly more than unpaid ones. Internships of at least 8 weeks are weighted more than shorter experiences. Internships at organizations recognizable to the hiring manager carry more weight than internships at obscure firms, though employers were quick to note that they value internships at smaller organizations when the work was substantive.
Multiple internships in a similar field signal commitment and developing expertise. Multiple internships in unrelated fields signal exploration but do not always translate to hiring advantages in any specific role.
The Access Problem
The rise of internships as a hiring criterion has produced significant equity concerns. Students from higher-income families can afford to take unpaid or low-paid internships, often in expensive cities, that produce career advantages. Students from lower-income backgrounds often cannot. A 2024 study at the University of California found that students from the lowest income quartile completed an average of 0.8 internships during college, compared to 2.4 internships for students from the highest income quartile.
The gap translates into measurable post-graduation employment differences. Students with multiple internships secured full-time job offers at significantly higher rates and at higher salaries than peers with one or no internships, even when controlling for GPA, major, and institution.
Programs Trying to Close the Gap
A growing number of universities have begun systematic interventions. Stanford, MIT, and several public universities now offer “internship stipends” to students whose family circumstances would otherwise prevent unpaid or low-paid internships. The University of Texas at Austin has established required summer internship programs for students in certain majors, with funding to cover gaps. Several state university systems have lobbied for state-level internship funding programs.
The interventions have produced measurable effects. Stanford reported that its internship stipend program, launched in 2022, had narrowed the internship completion gap between income quartiles by roughly half within three years.
The Major Choice Implication
The shift in employer preferences has implications for how students should think about major choice. The standard advice has been to choose majors based on long-term interest and the labor market for that specific field. The new advice, supported by the NACE data, is to choose majors partly on the basis of whether the program produces strong internship opportunities. A history major at a university with an active program of media, government, and policy internships may produce stronger employment outcomes than a business major at a university with weak internship infrastructure.
“The question is no longer just what you study,” said Dr. Okonkwo. “It is whether your program connects you to actual work in the field.”
What Students Should Look For
For students considering universities, internship infrastructure is now a major question to evaluate. The relevant indicators include the percentage of students completing internships before graduation, the average number of internships completed, the variety of organizations represented, and the financial support available for students from lower-income backgrounds.
For current students, the practical implication is to treat internship pursuit as a core academic priority rather than an optional supplement. Students who pursue internships actively starting in sophomore year tend to enter the labor market with significantly stronger profiles than students who treat internships as a senior-year concern.
The Broader Question
The rise of internships as a hiring criterion raises questions about the changing relationship between higher education and the labor market. Universities historically certified general competence and disciplinary knowledge. Internships, increasingly, certify specific applicability. The combination may be more valuable than either alone, but the model places significant demands on students and on universities to coordinate access. The institutions that adapt to this reality will produce graduates with strong outcomes. The institutions that do not will produce graduates whose academic preparation is overshadowed by their lack of work experience.
Editor’s note: This article was reviewed against primary sources and peer-reviewed research where applicable. Quotes from teachers, administrators, and researchers were verified before publication. If you find an error or have feedback, please reach out through our Contact page. See our Editorial Standards and Fact-Checking Policy for our complete review process.
