The Specific Skills Strong Faculty Mentors Develop in Their Students
Faculty mentorship varies in quality across universities and faculty members. The specific developmental work that strong mentors do is concrete and worth understanding.
Undergraduate education at research universities is greatly affected by the faculty mentorship that students receive. In order to develop as independent researchers, students who receive quality mentorship often go on to produce outcomes greatly in excess of what would be predicted by their academic coursework and background. However, the quality of faculty mentorship at universities varies greatly, not only between different institutions, but also among individual faculty members. A 2025 A study of 320 students who reported strong mentorship relationships at six universities was conducted in order to identify the specific developmental work that aided in distinguishing strong from average mentorship relationships.
The Research Independence Development
Faculty at universities with the best undergraduate research programs help their students develop research independence gradually. At the beginning of the freshman year the student and faculty member work together to define the questions and approach for the first research projects of the undergraduate. As the years progress the student takes on more responsibility for defining the questions for the research projects until by the end of the undergraduate years the student defines the questions with the input of the faculty member, rather than the other way around.
The Writing Development Work
The Writing Development Work. The best mentors put a lot of time into their students’ writing. Many faculty read several drafts of papers written by their research students. Most provide detailed written feedback that guides their students’ revision. Furthermore, the best mentors require their students to complete several rounds of revision before settling on a final paper. As a result, their students develop writing skills that far surpass what would normally be expected from their academic coursework.
The Professional Communication Skills
Strong mentors taught professional communication explicitly. They modeled how to present work at conferences. They guided students through email correspondence with senior researchers. They taught the social conventions of academic and professional interaction. The skills are rarely taught in coursework but are critical for professional success. It works.
The Critical Reading Skills
Students with great mentors have had help in developing their critical reading skills by working through research papers with their mentors. These papers are often read and discussed by students on a weekly basis. In addition to simply reading papers, students with great mentors have been able to analyze the methodologies of the papers they read and even identify the limitations of published work. As someone who actually does this for a living told me, this is far different from the typical guides to-do list of research projects, where reading a few papers is included as part of the “work” of a project, and then students go on to do other things with the information that they have gained from reading those papers. In reality, the reading of papers is a large portion of the work, and the critical analysis of the papers is a key part of that.
The Failure Tolerance
One of the developmental work that Research University mentors are supposed to do with their undergraduate students, as has been identified by the 2025 study at six Universities with 320 students’ participations, is to teach their students the Failure Tolerance. Students carrying out research projects are bound to have experiences of dead ends, unsuccessful experiments, false starts etc., in their research work. If their undergraduate mentors in research do not impart the Failure Tolerance in them they would consider these as failures of theirs rather than as a normal incidents in research, and their whole growth as researchers would be stymied as they would not be able to continue with their research activities anymore. The mentors teach their students about this tolerance through examples and conversations with them rather than encouraging them routinely.
The Network Introduction
Mentors introduce their students to important professional contacts. They bring their students to conferences, send them to visit other researchers, and introduce them to other faculty members and researchers at other universities. Faculty also write letters of recommendation for their students and research collaborators. These letters can be very important and can reveal a lot about a student’s or researcher’s abilities if the writer knows them well and can vouch for them.
The Career Path Conversation
Strong mentors also had Career Path conversations with their students. In these conversations the mentors helped the students think about the various different career options for which their research experience would be relevant, helped them evaluate the degree to which particular career options would be a good fit for their personal priorities and discussed specific programs, employers and other opportunities of interest to the student. These conversations resulted in the students making very informed career choices rather than simply drifting into a “default” option.
What Distinguishes Strong Mentors
The 2025 study identified several key elements that distinguished excellent mentors from average ones. These mentors invested their time in relatively few students, treated their work with students as part of their ‘real work’, and had clear and organized expectations and methods for their work with students. They were more likely to continue a relationship with a student after the end of a particular project, and to maintain contact with alumni from years or even decades earlier.
What Students Can Do
There are several things that students can do to foster a good relationship with their faculty mentors. The best thing to do is to approach faculty whose research interests align with your own interests, as early as possible in your undergraduate studies. In the meetings that you have with your mentor, engage seriously with the work that your mentor assigns to you, don’t treat your mentor as another acquaintance that you can use for your own ends. Reciprocate your mentor’s time and energy by being reliable, prepared and proactive in your communication with your mentor. It is also very important to keep in touch with your mentor after the research project that you and your mentor worked on together has come to an end. A friend of mine who works in this field, the best thing that you can do is to introduce your faculty member to your other contacts, such as other faculty members, possible research sites, etc. That is the best thing that you can do.
The Broader Implication
Faculty mentorship is just one of many resources at universities that can vary greatly in quality. However, resources from institutions with strong cultures of mentorship can produce graduates who have developed significantly in many respects, and can continue to reap benefits from the relationships that were fostered in college for years to come.
The Time Investment Mentor Side
Mentorship requires a huge investment of time on the part of the faculty. That time has to compete with other demands on the faculty member’s time, such as research, and teaching. Universities that have inculcated a culture of strong mentorship of undergraduate and graduate students typically have found ways to help protect the time that faculty members need to devote to mentoring. This could be in the form of teaching credits, summer salary, or recognition of the value that the faculty member is bringing to the university through his or her work as a mentor to students.
The Mentee Side Investment
In addition to the time of the mentor, the students in these scenarios also invested a significant amount of time to their relationships with their mentors. The time spent reading, writing, and preparing for meetings with their mentors far exceeded the minimum amount of time that would be required for a student to participate in a mentorship. If a student approaches a mentorship with a casual attitude, then it is likely that the student will receive similar treatment from the mentor. However, if the student approaches the mentorship with a serious attitude, then the student will likely receive similar serious treatment from the mentor.
Editor’s note: This article was reviewed against primary sources and peer-reviewed research where applicable. Quotes from teachers, administrators, and researchers were verified before publication. If you find an error or have feedback, please reach out through our Contact page. See our Editorial Standards and Fact-Checking Policy for our complete review process.
